Research
A review of ECCC’s method for estimating upstream GHGs
Jotham Peters
Torsten Jaccard
Michael Wolinetz
May, 2016
Summary
Trans Mountain commissioned Navius Research to review Environment and Climate Change Canada’s (ECCC) proposed method for estimating the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions upstream from oil and gas projects. This method will be applied to projects undergoing a federal environmental assessment, including Kinder Morgan’s proposed Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP). This report evaluates ECCC’s proposed method using three criteria: Will it provide an accurate estimate for the GHG impacts of an infrastructure project? Will it encourage and complement policies to reduce GHG emissions? Does it adequately account for uncertainty? It also provides commentary on how the method could be improved.
Highlights:
- Navius is in general approval of the method proposed by ECCC to estimate GHG emissions upstream from oil and gas projects.
- Several recommendations are made to refine the method. One recommendation is to provide a quantitative assessment of global impacts in addition to quantifying the GHG impacts within Canada.
- Incremental GHG emissions from Canadian extraction would be 0.1 to 0.4 Mt C02e per year, but this would likely be offset by extraction reductions globally. On a “well-to-tank” basis, the approval of TMEP would not result in incremental GHG emissions when considered globally.
Click above to download the report.
Download the report here.
This study was commissioned and funded by Kinder Morgan.
To learn more about this research, please contact Brianne Riehl.
Other Research
2023
Bitumen Beyond Combustion in a Net Zero Alberta
Potential of hydrogen to help decarbonize the Yukon
Modeling emissions reductions pathways in the Northwest Territories
Analyzing Net Zero Pathways for Canada
The value of interprovincial transmission for a net-zero future
Modeling Energy Transition Scenarios for Canada
What does achieving net zero mean for clean energy jobs in Canada?
What does a low-carbon fuel standard contribute to a policy mix?
2022
Damage Control: Reducing the costs of climate impacts in Canada
Animal-sourced food consumption and Canada’s emissions targets
Simulating Canada’s 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan
Potential of small modular reactors in hard-to-decarbonize industries
Hitting Canada’s climate targets with biogas & RNG
Under Water: The costs of climate change for Canada’s infrastructure
2021
Informing a strategy for reducing agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in British Columbia
The role of carbon capture and storage in Canada’s net zero future
Canada’s clean energy economy to 2030
Canada’s Clean Fuel Regulations explanation and insights
Towards Canada’s fair share: New modeling and analysis on achieving a stronger climate target
Assessing the impacts of the Conservative Plan to Combat Climate Change
2020
2019
Meeting Canada’s climate mitigation commitments under the Paris Agreement
Quantifying Canada’s clean energy economy
California and Québec’s ZEV mandates description
Reversing carbon leakage in the Canadian aluminum sector
Supporting the development of CleanBC
Saskatchewan’s carbon tax numbers are in and the answer is … reporting errors
Older
Review of British Columbia’s RLCFRR energy effectiveness ratios
Refining margins and fuel policy in British Columbia
Analysis of the proposed Canadian Clean Fuel Standard
Electrification best practices in Canada
A review of ECCC’s method for estimating upstream GHGs
Refining margins in British Columbia
Greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the Energy East pipeline project
The Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirement Regulation
How do industrial GHG reduction efforts affect demand for skilled labour?
Is British Columbia’s carbon tax good for household income?
How resilient are the Canadian oil sands to carbon constraints?